Black Crawling Systems Archive Release 1.0/Black Crawling Systems Archive Release 1.0 (L0pht Heavy Industries, Inc.)(1997).ISO/tezcat/Guns/Questionairre.txt

Text File | 1996-07-08 | 6KB | 132 lines

From the Radio Free Michigan archives

ftp://141.209.3.26/pub/patriot

If you have any other files you'd like to contribute, e-mail them to
[e-mail].
------------------------------------------------


Gun Control Rumor Fuels Conspiracy Theory
By Margeret Roth

    WASHINGTON - Imagine a team of select special
forces members who leave the military but keep their
rank and fatigues for missions. Their job is to mop up
where domestic law enforcement has failed. Then, after
their secret duty is finished, they go back into the military,
but their records show no break in service.
    A rumor, widely circulated and quickly spreading on
computer bulletin boards, has it that such a unit exists. It,
and the surrounding storm of suspicion, stem from a ques-
tion in a naval officer's graduate research survey.
    As the story goes, members of special operations forces,
including Army Rangers and Navy Sea-Air-Land forces,
are being asked if they would fire on American citizens on
American soil. Those who say yes are being assembled into
special teams.
        Despite repeated denials from military officials, the
story has taken on a life of its own, even though the Naval
Postgraduate School in Monterey, Calif., where the naval
officer is a student, repeatedly has insisted that the ques-
tion is nothing more than research for a master's degree.
    "Total hogwash," said school spokesman John Sanders
of the theory that the officer's question reflects an admin-
istration plan to disarm Americans. "I personally feel [the
questioni is a bit abrupt. However, it is trying to get at a
tough issue: unit cohesiveness, and whether a member un-
derstands a lawful or unlawful order."
        The officer's question, which is like the one in the
rumor, was posed to 300 Marines at Twentynine Palms Ma-
rine Corps Air-Ground Combat Center, Calif., May 10. It
was meant to test their opinion of possible nontraditional
missions, according to a school spokesman.
    The last of 46 questions, it said: "The U.S. government
declares a ban on the possession, saie, transportation and
transfer of all nonsporting firearms. A 30 day amnesty
period is permitted for these firearms to be turned over to
the local authorities. At the end of this peried, a number
of citizen groups refuse to turn over their firearms. Con-
sider the following statement:
        "'I would fire upon U.S. citizens who refuse or resist
confiscation of firearms banned by the U.S. government."'
    The survey calls for one of five responses, ranging from
"strongly disagee" to "no opinion."
    The now-infamous Question 46 purely was hypothetical,
designed to see if the Marines understood the limits of
their constitutional authority, according to Sanders.

issue touches raw political nerve

    But that's not how many have greeted the question. In
the five months since the survey was given, Question 46
has generated a steady hum of suspicion in opinion col-
umns, on radio talk shows and over fax machines and
electronic mail: Does this survey reflect a Clinton adminis-
tration effort to turn service members against their own
countrymen? Is the president preparing to turn them over
to the command of foreign powers?
    The six-page survey explores a variety of nontraditional
missions, domestic and foreign, from security at national
events to substitute teaching to a national emergenry po-
lice force. It also asks for opinions on varioiis possible com-
mand arrangements with U.N. forces.

        Conservative columnist Phyllis Schlafly zeroed in on
Question 46 in a recent column, calling it "a real shock-
er." She said the entire survey should cause people to wor-
ry "about what kinds of missions our U.S. armed services
will be sent on in Bill Clinton's New World Order."
    The question was meant to test whether the Marines,
most of whom were enlisted, understood the principle that
U.S. law prohibits the federal military from becoming in-
volved in domestic law enforcement, Sanders said.
        Efforts to reach the survey's author, Lt. Cmdr. Ernest
G. Cunningham, were unsuccessful. Sanders would not ar-
range an interview with him, but said results of the sur-
vey will be available shortly after it is completed in
December.
    The survey became a public issue when a lance corporal
sent it to a conservative magazine called New American,
said John Manley, a former Marine captain and the public
affairs officer who arranged for Cunningham to assemble
the 300 Marines.

Topic won't die

    It still is being talked about on electronic mail. A recent
visit to Military City Online's activeduty Marine bulletin
board found 24 messages about the survey. Messages also
have been posted recently on the Internet, a worldwide
web of computer systems and bulletin boards. Although
few who wrote messages appeared to have seen the hill
survey, it has conjured fears that the government intends
to use the military as a domestic police force.
    One of the most exotic stories to arise is about the use
of former special forces members. An Internet user identi-
fying himself as Bob called them "triage" teams.
    The degree of detail in his description is suitable for a
novel. Bob said the teams are stationed at Ellsworth Air
Force Base, S.D., using the recently vacated missile silos
for billeting and their headquarters operation.
        Postgraduate school officials are trying to speed the
release of the student's thesis alter it is completed in Decem-
ber, to "short-circuit" the usual proess of publishing it
through the National Technical Information Service, said
spokesman Sanders.
    "It's certainly not our intent to keep this from anyone,"
he said.


------------------------------------------------
(This file was found elsewhere on the Internet and uploaded to the
Radio Free Michigan archives by the archive maintainer.


All files are ZIP archives for fast download.

 E-mail [e-mail])